In essence, he believes that reason and faith are friends, not foes, in the pursuit of truth. In his debates, Craig typically uses his personal testimony as one of his five points for God’s existence. But while he utilizes deductive reasoning to get the inquirer to come to the banquet table, Craig emphatically stresses that faith, not mere arguments, is what brings a person into relationship with the God of this universe. This is the power of sound reasoning, which, if one is not careful, can easily turn into rationalism. In addition, forty-seven people in the 8,000-member audience that night became Christians, with none moving into the atheist camp. The atheists and skeptics whom he debates are no slouches-names such a s Gerd Lüdemann, John Dominic Crossan, and Christopher Hitchens are among them-but more often than not, many in the audiences at his debates are left scratching their heads, wondering, “Was this opponent a set-up to make Christianity look good?”įor example, in an early debate held in June 1993 at Willow Creek Community Church, eighty-two percent of the audience that was polled afterward said Craig’s reasoning was more persuasive than what was offered by his atheist opponent. degrees and a reputation for logical thinking, William Lane Craig may very well be the best Christian debater in modern history. Teachings of the Presidents of the Church. Mormon Objections to Christian Evangelism.Doctrine and Covenants / Pearl of Great Price.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |